RSS

What will the next Governor of Maine do about our Waste Crisis?

Rick Bennett:

Yes. In 2003, Juniper Ridge was purchased as a state asset to serve Maine people, not to become a regional dumping ground. In 2022, the Legislature passed LD 1639, which I strongly supported, to close the loophole that allowed out-of-state waste to be reclassified as “Maine waste” after passing through in-state facilities. Since then, Casella Waste Systems has been threatening to reject sludge from municipal waste water treatment plants, and charging taxpayers more to dispose of their sludge. They blame both LD 1639 and LD 1911, which was an important new law to ban the spreading of PFAS contaminated sludge on Maine farmland. 

Just last year, LD 297 was a bill that aimed to delay the loophole closure and allow unlimited crushed waste from out of state to be used for landfill cover—a practice that has nothing to do with sludge stabilization and everything to do with corporate profit. I vehemently opposed that bill. There is no technical requirement to use out-of-state construction and demolition debris to stabilize sludge. Other landfill operators use contaminated soil, wood chips, or municipal solid waste, or they invest in dewatering and drying technologies. Maine should support that infrastructure. As Governor, I will hold Casella accountable to Maine law, preserve Juniper Ridge capacity for Maine waste, and require sludge to be properly treated before disposal.

[You can watch my remarks defending LD 1639 on the Senate floor, just before it received a unanimous vote of support, here: https://legislature.maine.gov/Audio/#senate_chamber?event=86137&startDate=2022-04-07T10:00:00-04:00 (begins at 1:34)]

2. Tens of thousands of tons of waste from out of state processed at Maine facilities is re-classified as Maine waste when entering recycling facilities where it is mixed with Maine waste. As Governor will you: Require recycling facilities to record the tonnage from different states be kept distinct from each other in order to have accurate accounting of out-of-state waste?

Yes. In 2022, the Legislature closed the loophole that allowed “out of state waste laundering” through facilities like ReSource in Lewiston. Under current law (38 M.R.S § 1303-C), facilities cannot send more waste to Juniper Ridge than they originally received from Maine sources. Any excess is out-of-state waste and is barred from the landfill. That means accurate accounting by state of origin. The law is clear. As Governor, I will enforce it. No more exemptions. Maine’s landfill is for Maine waste, and companies that profit from importing waste from Massachusetts and New Hampshire will be held accountable.

3. Over half of Maine waste is landfilled in Penobscot County. This disproportionally impacts the Penobscot Nation and all surrounding towns with water, air and land pollution that endangers public health and the environment. As Governor will you: Support Environmental Justice by evaluating and limiting the impact on communities unequally affected by pollution?

Yes. The Penobscot Nation and communities surrounding the landfill should not be treated as a sacrifice zone. Juniper Ridge sends millions of gallons of toxic leachate every year to a facility that was never designed to handle landfill toxins, and that “treated” leachate is discharged into the Penobscot River. Fish in that river now test high for PFAS, threatening the treaty rights and cultural identity of a riverine people whose lives are inseparable from that water. This is environmental injustice, and it is unacceptable. 

Just recently, Maine’s courts blocked the State’s attempt to expand Juniper Ridge because officials failed to properly consider environmental justice in the public benefit determination—a requirement recently codified in state law. That new law and court decision was a victory for the Penobscot Nation, Don’t Waste Maine, and for accountability. I am watching the appeal closely. As Governor, I will enforce environmental justice standards, evaluate and limit the disproportionate burden pollution places on the Penobscot Nation and surrounding communities, and reject any proposal that treats Indigenous homelands as dumping grounds for regional waste. With Casella’s 30-year contract expiring in seven years, Maine must open the process to competition and demand an operator committed to responsible, transparent management in the public interest.

4. Do you have a policy for managing waste that: reduces volume and toxicity of waste; conserves and reuses resources; shares burdens more equitably; promotes environmental justice and the right to live safely in our communities; and provides transparent public participation in policy and licensing decisions?

Yes. My approach to waste policy is built on a record of environmental leadership and a deep commitment to protecting Maine’s natural resources. In addition to championing the laws to close the out of state waste loophole and ban land-application of PFAS contaminated sludge, I was the lead senate co-sponsor of Maine’s Extended Producer Responsibility law for packaging, which shifts waste management costs from municipalities and taxpayers to the companies that produce the packaging in the first place. I have strongly supported Maine’s product stewardship laws, which prevent waste at its source. 

While recycling is a key strategy to conserve natural resources, I see Maine as a national leader for systems of reuse. With the influx of funding that will come into Maine through the packaging law, we can build out the infrastructure for reuse systems—washing facilities, delivery networks, and collection systems—that keep toxics and trash out of landfills and incinerators, preserve resources, and create jobs. The next Governor will need to fully implement that law because it’s a critical step to help municipalities pay for and improve their waste systems while reducing the burden on property taxpayers.

Transparency and public participation are not optional. Democracy only works when the people it serves can actually see it working. That means no more backroom deals, no more no-bid contracts. With Casella’s 30-year contract expiring in seven years, Maine must open the process to competition and ensure every Mainer—not just those with lobbyists and lawyers—has a real voice in who manages our public landfill and how. 

Waste management is environmental justice. It is public health. And it requires a Governor willing to stand up to powerful corporate interests who are profiting off of the current extractive system, enforce the laws we pass, open the doors to real public participation, and put Maine communities first.

Hannah Pingree

1. Maine’s state-owned landfill, Juniper Ridge in Old Town, set aside by statute for Maine waste, is rapidly reaching capacity with waste and sludge brought in from other states.

As Governor will you: Save Maine’s disposal capacity at Juniper Ridge and support efforts to set up the infrastructure and regulation that requires sludge to be dried and reduced in volume before it is landfilled?

Yes. I am concerned about the issues at Juniper Ridge, and I believe they require action, and I would work proactively on a plan to address them, and reconsider acceptance of out of state waste. I also think we need more consultation with the Tribal Nations and surrounding communities as we consider the issues with Juniper Ridge.

I would support efforts to set up the infrastructure and regulation necessary to ensure sludge is dried and reduced in volume before it is landfilled and I supported DEP’s bond proposal to do that last year. I’d also continue to support efforts to reduce landfill reliance through statewide investments in recycling, composting, and waste diversion infrastructure. That being said, Maine’s landfill issues are at a crisis point – especially due to sewage sludge, PFAS issues and capacity – and the next Governor will need a thoughtful plan to address it.

2. Tens of thousands of tons of waste from out of state processed at Maine facilities is reclassified as Maine waste when entering recycling facilities where it is mixed with Maine waste.

As Governor will you: Require recycling facilities to record the tonnage from different states be kept distinct from each other in order to have accurate accounting of out-of-state waste?

Yes. I support efforts to better track out of state waste and believe we must also reconsider, long-term, the acceptance of out-of-state waste.

I would support requiring recycling facilities to record the tonnage from different states and keep that accounting distinct so Maine has accurate information about out-of-state waste.

3. Over half of Maine waste is landfilled in Penobscot County. This disproportionally impacts the Penobscot Nation and all surrounding towns with water, air and land pollution that endangers public health and the environment.

As Governor will you: Support Environmental Justice by evaluating and limiting the impact on communities unequally affected by pollution?

Yes. As I said above, I’m very concerned about these issues and would absolutely support evaluating and limiting the impact on Tribal Nations. To this end, l would welcome regular engagement with the Tribal Chiefs and their representatives from each Tribal Nation, inviting the leaders of Tribal Nations to quarterly government and government meetings to address these issues and others facing the Nations. My approach would also include reworking co-management of environmental resources with the Penobscot Nation and expanding environmental justice consultation in DEP’s landfill siting laws.

4. Do you have a policy for managing waste that: reduces volume and toxicity of waste; conserves and reuses resources; shares burdens more equitably; promotes environmental justice and the right to live safely in our communities; and provides transparent public participation in policy and licensing decisions?

Yes. My policy would focus both on reducing landfill reliance through statewide investments in recycling, composting, and waste diversion infrastructure but also in creating a more robust state and local partnership on waste management – that doesn’t leave responsibility to communities alone but includes consultation with communities most impacted by current facilities or any newly proposed facilities.

Expanding manufacturer responsibility through thoughtful EPR policies—building on Maine’s nation-leading bottle bill and mattress law—should be part of the solution, as should developing a deconstruction network to keep construction and demolition debris out of landfills and create a local stream of reusable building materials.

I have long supported strong chemical disclosure laws and holding manufacturers accountable—beginning with my successful Kid-Safe Products Act in 2008 and would continue to do so as governor when it comes to PFAS accountability and responsibility. As governor, I will continue to back meaningful reforms that put the health of Maine people, farmers, and communities ahead of polluters. I think we need to work hard to hold polluters, like PFAS producers, responsible for the impacts of these chemicals on our communities, health and waste management.

Finally, Maine needs stronger, comprehensive environmental testing and monitoring, particularly for PFAS and other contaminants, and a systematic approach that brings together environmental leaders, Tribal Nations, municipalities, and scientific experts to address solid waste and landfill management.

As governor, I will lead a transparent, open state government that strengthens public confidence and makes it easier for citizens to engage. Increasing opportunities for participation—especially for those facing the greatest barriers—and ensuring transparency at every level will help build trust, improve outcomes, and create stronger support for state policies. I have done that work through Maine’s climate planning process – which now includes more robust strategies on waste management and environmental justice. And I’d continue to do that as governor.

As governor, I would expand on this record—making public information easy to access, creating clear avenues for participation, and improving how state government works for Maine people, from navigating health care programs to DEP permitting.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 10, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Automated Trash Collection – A way to limit waste?

Automated Trash Collection – A way to limit waste?

A recent article in the Maine Monitor by Marna Miller brought attention to changes in trash collection in Rumford. The new system employs collection trucks with mechanical arms to lift and empty special containers.The change is aimed at limiting households from using the town service for excessive amounts of waste.

Each household will be limited to one 65 gallon bin and a smaller 18 gallon recycling bin. The plan will help Rumford budget for waste collection and the contractor plans to eliminate two workers per collection truck to cut costs. For more details check out the article in the Maine Monitor.

Rumford will now join Auburn and Lewiston along with big cities like New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles and Chicago in efforts to deal with the costs of massive amount of waste.

piles of trash being pushed by heavy equipment
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 4, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: ,

Maine Adopts Zero Waste Policies

Maine Adopts Zero Waste Policies
a field of discarded vegetables with heavy equipment

Food Waste Reductions

Maine passed legislation last year that promises to reduce the amount of food waste that ends up in landfills. Over 40% of waste is organic material that creates harmful methane gas as it decomposes. Reducing the volume of waste will stretch the useful life of our state owned landfill, Juniper Ridge.

The legislation doesn’t take effect until 2030 when large food processors like schools and hospitals will be required to donate edible food to the needy and send the rest to anaerobic digestion or a compost facility if they are within 25 miles. The program will expand over time to include more food processors.

Refillable Containers

plastic containers with a collection of refillable bottles

Maine legislators also adopted An Act Regarding Businesses’ and Consumers’ Use of Returnable,
Reusable and Refillable Containers for Food, Beverages and Nonfood Items.
This allows consumers to bypass disposable packaging and use their own reusable containers. Every small step we can take to reduce waste makes a big impact. The more individuals who use refillable containers the less burden gets passed on to the environment..

Maine challenges “Advanced Chemical Recycling” myth

people in a store near a sign reading No toxic chemical plant

Lobbyists for the chemical and plastics industries have made claims about plastic recycling for years. Very little plastic is made into new products. Now the industry has come up with a new myth, ‘advanced recycling’. The term is misleading. The process uses incineration. When plastics are burned they release harmful chemicals. Maine will not allow these companies to call their methods recycling unless they can prove 50% of the plastic is truly recycled. Contrary to industry claims this is not manufacturing but is another method of ‘disposal’. Maine was out ahead of this dangerous practice and adopted LD 1660 in 2024.

Maine faces pressure from the waste industry.

You can make a difference by reaching out to your legislator and letting them know you appreciate these steps to protect Maine’s environment. Members of the waste industry keep pressure on our legislators and agencies to go along with their plans to import waste and sewage sludge from other New England states.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on October 2, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: , , , ,

Is the JRL Expansion Application Still Valid?

Is the JRL Expansion Application Still Valid?

Significant Change to the Expansion Proposal

September 10, 2026

The public Benefit Determination portion of the permitting process for expansion of the Juniper Ridge Landfill requires a PFAS treatment facility be operational on site before the expansion moves forward. The operator of Juniper Ridge Landfill, NEWSME (Casella), is proposing a plan that would move PFAS treatment of the toxic “garbage juice” (leachate) produced by the landfill outside the existing licensing process for the Juniper Ridge expansion.

This appears to significantly change what was proposed in the original application for expansion—and, importantly, would move PFAS treatment outside the current licensing process.

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (Maine DEP) has asked Casella to submit a design report for treatment and removal of the “forever toxic” PFAS chemicals from the leachate

Appeals of the public Benefit Determination portion of the permitting process require that a PFAS treatment facility be operational on site before the expansion moves forward. The new proposal appears to offer a way around that requirement. It states:

“NEWSME does not intend to seek licensure of the PFAS treatment system through this licensing process because the system will not be located at JRL.”

That raises a fundamental question:

If the proposed location for treatment has changed, is the original expansion application still valid?

The expansion application currently before the state clearly outlines plans for a PFAS treatment facility at the Juniper Ridge Landfill site. This is not a minor detail or an incidental component of the project. It is a significant part of how the landfill’s leachate is to be managed.

NEWSME / Casella submitted:

“Although the project is still under consideration and subject to change, NEWSME currently plans to install the PFAS treatment system at the nearby Pine Tree Landfill in Hampden, subject to obtaining all required approvals and agreements.”

Apparently NEWSME would seek approval for the treatment system by amending the solid waste facility license for the Pine Tree Landfill.

In other words, the PFAS treatment facility described in the expansion application would no longer be located at Juniper Ridge. Instead, the company is proposing a possible treatment system at another landfill, one that is not even part of the expansion application currently under review.

Why Should Maine DEP Accept This Change?

The Maine DEP should require NEWSME to submit a new or substantially revised expansion application rather than allowing a major change at this point in the process.

Why should a state licensing process rely on a plan that NEWSME itself describes as “still under consideration and subject to change”?

If the location of the PFAS treatment system has changed, and if the system is no longer part of the Juniper Ridge expansion license, the public deserves an opportunity to review the revised proposal and understand its environmental and transportation impacts.

Diagram of leachate from a landfill

What Happens to the Leachate?

Moving PFAS treatment from Juniper Ridge also creates another concern: transportation of landfill leachate.

Landfill leachate contains toxic chemicals that include PFAS and heavy metals such as arsenic. The toxic leachate would need to be transported from Juniper Ridge to the proposed treatment location at Pine Tree Landfill in Hampden (owned by Casella) or some other facility. That means toxic leachate would be traveling on public roads between two landfill sites.

There do not appear to be details about how this material would be transported, including the proposed transportation methods, spill prevention measures, emergency procedures, or other safety protocols.

If the expansion proposal has fundamentally changed, the application should change with it.

Maine DEP should require NEWSME/Casella to submit a new application that clearly describes the proposed PFAS treatment system, its location, how leachate will be transported, and the environmental and public-safety protections that will be in place.

The public deserves nothing less than a complete, transparent, and enforceable plan before the Juniper Ridge Landfill expansion is approved.

The Public Deserves a Clear and Complete Proposal

Subscribe for our latest posts & Don’t Waste ME updates!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WHERE to send comments on JRL expansion

WHERE to send comments on JRL expansion
person writing a letter

Ever wonder where you can send comments about the proposed Juniper Ridge Expansion?

You can send comments anytime on the JRL expansion to: Vera Maheu: vera.a.maheu@maine.gov

Comments are posted to the public comment record. But be sure to specify your comments are for the public record.

Here is the link where you can read public comments: https://www.maine.gov/dep/ftp/Juniper-Ridge/PBD2024/public-comments/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 3, 2026 in Current Events

 

Schedule of next steps for Juniper Ridge Expansion Application

On August 14, 2026, Maine Department of Environmental Protection held a virtual pre-hearing conference regarding the upcoming Public Hearing considering the application for expansion of the Juniper Ridge Landfill.
The roles and responsibilities of the participants, the scope of the public hearing, the statutory and regulatory standards, the proposed schedule for the public hearing and required filings, and to discuss other administrative matters. The third
procedural order reviews matters discussed at the pre-hearing conference and sets forth the rulings of the Presiding Officer.
A copy of the Department’s Rules Governing the Conduct of Licensing Hearing and (Third Procedural Order) the rules for licensing hearings are included.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 27, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: , , ,

Juniper Ridge Landfill Permitting Pushes Ahead of Court Decision

Cartoon of a man in a suit jumping over a fence with regulations written on it. He carries a briefcase and large bag of cash and he is wearing a hard hat.

Despite the fact that the Court has yet to rule on the Public Benefit Determination the Bureau of General Services and Maine Department of Environmental Protection are moving forward with the process of permitting an expansion of Juniper Ridge Landfill. A Public Benefit Determination is the first step required in permitting and licensing the proposed expansion.

Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for December 7, 8 and 9, 2026

While the Penobscot Nation and concerned folks around Maine await a ruling from the court regarding Environmental Justice the state is pushing forward with the process of expansion permitting & licensing. A public hearing is tentatively scheduled for December 7, 8 and 9, 2026. with a portion of the public hearing dedicated to comments and testimony from the General Public, to be held on the afternoon or evening of December 9, 2026.The current proposed venue is the Rangely Hall of the Eastern Maine Community College located at 268 Sylvan Road in Bangor.

The public can submit written comments for the record anytime during the process. Submit comments to: Vera Maheu: vera.a.maheu@maine.gov

Attendant documents can be found here: https://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/juniperridge/

Don’t Waste Me and other advocates from throughout the state seek a virtual option for participation at the ACTUAL hearing! Please mark your calendar and join us in this important stand for Environmental Justice.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 22, 2026 in Current Events

 

Maine DEP & Casella challenged to do the right thing

Expansion plan hinges on Environmental Justice

Answering Casella’s and MEDEP’s assertions that environmental justice is
complicated they counter: It is an issue of people who matter with rights and who should have
access to clean air and clean water and the ability to live in their communities without
pollution and threats to their safety
. Following a July 23, 2026 hearing, in Penobscot Superior
Court on the appeal of the Penobscot Nation (PN) and Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) of
the Public Benefit Determination (PBD) issued by MEDEP Commissioner Loyzim, it was put this
way:
“It’s getting to the point where it could be unhealthy and unsafe for me to simply
continue to practice the cultural traditions that my tribe has practiced literally for
thousands and thousands of years.”
John Banks, member of Penobscot Nation

Life On Appeal in the Penobscot Superior Court


“The department recites evidence, but it does not engage with it . . . [d]oes not
meaningfully analyze the nation’s unique relationship with the Penobscot River nor
the burdens that the Penobscot Nation faces.”
Alexandra Enriquez St Pierre, CLF arguments
before Penobscot Superior Court Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80C Civil Action No. PENSC-APP-2024-
00014, July 23, 2026 (emphasis added)

READ MORE Comments for the Public Record Submitted by Jacquelyn Elliott ǀ August 17, 2026

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Landfill Gas – The ELEPHANT in the air!

Landfill Gas – The ELEPHANT in the air!

Scientific studies reveal the toxic truth – landfill gas contains concentrations of PFAS comparable to landfill leachatte!

an elephant in the clouds

The distressing amount of PFAS in landfill gas was brought to light during testimony in Penobscot Superior Court, July 23, 2026, in the appeal of the Pubic Benefit Determination issued by Maine Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Loyzim.

“Even under conservative assumptions, the massive [volatile PFAS] leaving in landfill gas, (32 to 76%), was comparable to or greater than the mass leaving in landfill leachate, (24 to 68%). These findings suggest that landfill gas, a less scrutinized byproduct, served as a major pathway for the mobility of PFAS from landfills.” as reported in the study, Landfill Gas, a Major Pathway for Neutral Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Release.

The problem of airborne toxins will persist long after landfill closure. According to an article in National Environmental Science and Technology “the release of PFAS from landfills will persist given the comparable PFAS concentrations in landfill gas from sites that have been closed for two to five decades.” Let that sink in; 30 to 50 years of airborne chemicals AFTER landfill closure.

The Maine DEP did not consider Airborne PFAS in the Public Benefit Determination.The Maine Department of Environmental Protection approved the proposed expansion of Juniper Ridge Landfill based, in part, by the possibility of reducing the levels of PFAS in the leachatte.

Even if you can’t see the elephant

– it’s there!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 12, 2026 in Current Events

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Be In the Room! (via zoom) August 14th at 1:00

Be In the Room! (via zoom) August 14th at 1:00

You can be in the room and watch as those with intervener status continue to press for Environmental Justice!

Ronald Mongeon, Eastern Maine Regional Office Director of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection released a Public notice for the pre-hearing conference scheduled for August 14th at 1:00 p.m. The notice includes the link for the zoom meeting that can be used by the general public. This will allow them to watch and listen to the meeting; however, they will be unable to comment. This is simply a pre-hearing conference where scheduling of the process and everyone’s roles will be determined. Written public comment continues to be accepted on the application itself, and public testimony of course will be welcome at the actual hearing. Your presence will show the Maine DEP you care about Environmental Justice!

The meeting will have the following rough general agenda, subject to change as needed:

  1. The roles and responsibilities of the parties/intervenors.
  2. The expectations for how parties shall conduct themselves during the public hearing and filings.
  3. The scope of the public hearing.
  4. The process and requirements for witness lists, pre-filed testimony, and rebuttals.
  5. The schedule and deadlines for submitting witness lists, pre-filed testimony, and rebuttals.
  6. The scheduling of the public hearing.
  7. Other administrative matters.

We hope you join Us and Support Environmental Justice!

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 4, 2026 in Current Events

 
 

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started